http://adf.ly/tiMlc

This is another Copyrighted post by Sony Roy and all FBI rules apply nationwide for all intruders who would attempt to copy or disseminate such information without prior written approval by Mr. Roy. All violators will be prosecuted with vehemence. Secondly, As all will observe all these torts are intentional and committed for specific reasons. as premeditated Torts, they are also crimes if I understand the law correctly. 1.AUTHORITATIVE CITATION: PROPRIA PERSONA: in support of my non-attorney status, I cite the in propria persona clause of the United States Supreme Court which reads thus: The Supreme Court noted that "[i]n the federal courts, the right of self-representation has been protected by statute since the beginnings of our Nation. Section 35 of the Judiciary Act of 1789, 1 Stat. 73, 92, enacted by the First Congress and signed by President Washington one day before the Sixth Amendment was proposed, provided that 'in all the courts of the United States, the parties may plead and manage their own causes personally or by the assistance of counsel.'" I submit the First TORT on all defendants including those who merely supported and accepted what was done before, meaning the officers of the court and the Judicial Officers of the court. the total TORTS IS TWO and the defendants would be then 20 2x20= 40 and the injurious TORTS are 55 . So 40x55= grand total of 2200. TORTS 2. 14th Amendment: Section 1. All persons born or naturalized (I am) in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens (I am) of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State (Florida) shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States(Like Florida did to me via the Walton County TORT #1); nor shall any State deprive any person of life,(TORT #2) liberty (TORT #3) , or property (TORT #4), without due process of law (TORT # 5); nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws (TORT #6). Multiply 6 TORTS by the Number of defendants which is a total of 20 and you arrive at the first quantified number of 120 TORTS Causal TORTS just from that one citation) By multiplying 55 injurious Torts or resulting from the CAUSAL TORTS we arrive at the number of 120x55 = 6,600. TORTS just from that One major vioalation 3.1964 Civil Rights Act of Congress. - 4.A civil right is an enforceable right or privilege, which if interfered with by another gives rise to an action for injury. Examples of civil rights are freedom of speech, press, and assembly; the right to vote; freedom from involuntary servitude; and the right to equality in public places. 4."Civil rights" are the rights of individuals to receive equal treatment (and to be free from unfair treatment or "discrimination") in a number of settings -- including education, employment, housing, and more -- and based on certain legally-protected characteristics. Historically, the "Civil Rights Movement" referred to efforts toward achieving true equality for African-Americans in all facets of society, but today the term "civil rights" is also used to describe the advancement of equality for all people regardless of race, sex, age, disability, national origin, religion, or certain other characteristics. - See more at: http://civilrights.findlaw.com/civil-rights-overview/what-are-civil-rights.html#sthash.aP4PBZpI.dpuf 5.What is Discrimination?dəˌskriməˈnāSH(ə)n/ 1. WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THESE TORTS AS I SEE THEM? AUTHORITATIVE CITATION: 42 U.S. Code § 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law. Title 18, U.S.C., Section 249 Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr., Hate Crimes Prevention Act This statute makes it unlawful to willfully cause bodily injury—or attempting to do so with fire, firearm, or other dangerous weapon—when 1) the crime was committed because of the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin of any person, or 2) the crime was committed because of the actual or perceived religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability of any person and the crime affected interstate or foreign commerce or occurred within federal special maritime and territorial jurisdiction. The law also provides funding and technical assistance to state, local, and tribal jurisdictions to help them to more effectively investigate, prosecute, and prevent hate crimes. The law provides for a maximum 10–year prison term, unless death (or attempts to kill) results from the offense, or unless the offense includes kidnapping or attempted kidnapping, or aggravated sexual abuse or attempted aggravated sexual abuse. For offenses not resulting in death, there is a seven–year statute of limitations. For offenses resulting in death, there is no statute of limitations. back to top -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241 Conspiracy Against Rights This statute makes it unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person of any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution or the laws of the United States, (or because of his/her having exercised the same). It further makes it unlawful for two or more persons to go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another with the intent to prevent or hinder his/her free exercise or enjoyment of any rights so secured. Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to ten years, or both; and if death results, or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years, or for life, or may be sentenced to death. back to top -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law This statute makes it a crime for any person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom to willfully deprive or cause to be deprived from any person those rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution and laws of the U.S. This law further prohibits a person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation or custom to willfully subject or cause to be subjected any person to different punishments, pains, or penalties, than those prescribed for punishment of citizens on account of such person being an alien or by reason of his/her color or race. Acts under "color of any law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within the bounds or limits of their lawful authority, but also acts done without and beyond the bounds of their lawful authority; provided that, in order for unlawful acts of any official to be done under "color of any law," the unlawful acts must be done while such official is purporting or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. This definition includes, in addition to law enforcement officials, individuals such as Mayors, Council persons, Judges, Nursing Home Proprietors, Security Guards, etc., persons who are bound by laws, statutes ordinances, or customs. Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to one year, or both, and if bodily injury results or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire shall be fined or imprisoned up to ten years or both, and if death results, or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death. back to top -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Title 18, U.S.C., Section 245 Federally Protected Activities 1) This statute prohibits willful injury, intimidation, or interference, or attempt to do so, by force or threat of force of any person or class of persons because of their activity as: a) A voter, or person qualifying to vote...; b) a participant in any benefit, service, privilege, program, facility, or activity provided or administered by the United States; c) an applicant for federal employment or an employee by the federal government; d) a juror or prospective juror in federal court; and e) a participant in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. 2) Prohibits willful injury, intimidation, or interference or attempt to do so, by force or threat of force of any person because of race, color, religion, or national origin and because of his/her activity as: a) A student or applicant for admission to any public school or public college; b) a participant in any benefit, service, privilege, program, facility, or activity provided or administered by a state or local government; c) an applicant for private or state employment, private or state employee; a member or applicant for membership in any labor organization or hiring hall; or an applicant for employment through any employment agency, labor organization or hiring hall; d) a juror or prospective juror in state court; e) a traveler or user of any facility of interstate commerce or common carrier; or f) a patron of any public accommodation, including hotels, motels, restaurants, lunchrooms, bars, gas stations, theaters...or any other establishment which serves the public and which is principally engaged in selling food or beverages for consumption on the premises. This is highly serious as these attempts perpetrate currently. 3) Prohibits interference by force or threat of force against any person because he/she is or has been, or in order to intimidate such person or any other person or class of persons from participating or affording others the opportunity or protection to so participate, or lawfully aiding or encouraging other persons to participate in any of the benefits or activities listed in items (1) and (2), above without discrimination as to race, color, religion, or national origin. Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to one year, or both, and if bodily injury results or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire shall be fined or imprisoned up to ten years or both, and if death results or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be subject to imprisonment for any term of years or for life or may be sentenced to death. back to top -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Title 18, U.S.C., Section 248 Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act This statute prohibits (1) the use of force or threat of force or physical obstruction, to intentionally injure, intimidate or interfere with or attempt to injure, intimidate or interfere with any person or any class of persons from obtaining or providing reproductive health services; (2) the use of force or threat of force or physical obstruction to intentionally injure, intimidate, or interfere with or attempt to injure, intimidate, or interfere with any person lawfully exercising or seeking to exercise the First Amendment right of religious freedom at a place of religious worship; or (3) intentionally damages or destroys the property of a facility, or attempts to do so, because such facility provides reproductive health services or intentionally damages or destroys the property of a place of religious worship. This statute does not apply to speech or expressive conduct protected by the First Amendment. Non obstructive demonstrations are legal. Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment for an offense involving exclusively a nonviolent physical obstruction, the fine shall be not more than $10,000 and the length of imprisonment shall be up to six months, or both, for the first offense: and the fine shall, notwithstanding section 3571, be up to $25,000 and the length of imprisonment shall be not more than 18 months, or both, for a subsequent offense; and if bodily injury results, the length of imprisonment shall be up to ten years, and if death results, it shall be for any term of years or for life. back to top -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Title 42, U.S.C., Section 3631 Criminal Interference with Right to Fair Housing This statute makes it unlawful for any individual(s), by the use of force or threatened use of force, to injure, intimidate, or interfere with (or attempt to injure, intimidate, or interfere with), any person's housing rights because of that person's race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin. Among those housing rights enumerated in the statute are: ◾The sale, purchase, or renting of a dwelling; ◾the occupation of a dwelling; ◾the financing of a dwelling; ◾contracting or negotiating for any of the rights enumerated above. ◾applying for or participating in any service, organization, or facility relating to the sale or rental of dwellings. This statute also makes it unlawful by the use of force or threatened use of force, to injure, intimidate, or interfere with any person who is assisting an individual or class of persons in the exercise of their housing rights. Punishment varies from a fine of up to $1,000 or imprisonment of up to one year, or both, and if bodily injury results, shall be fined up to $10,000 or imprisoned up to ten years, or both, and if death results, shall be subject to imprisonment for any term of years or for life. back to top -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141 Pattern and Practice This civil statute was a provision within the Crime Control Act of 1994 and makes it unlawful for any governmental authority, or agent thereof, or any person acting on behalf of a governmental authority, to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct by law enforcement officers or by officials or employees of any governmental agency with responsibility for the administration of juvenile justice or the incarceration of juveniles that deprives persons of rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. Whenever the Attorney General has reasonable cause to believe that a violation has occurred, the Attorney General, for or in the name of the United States, may in a civil action obtain appropriate equitable and declaratory relief to eliminate the pattern or practice. Types of misconduct covered include, among other things: 1. Excessive Force 2. Discriminatory Harassment 3. False Arrest 4. Coercive Sexual Conduct 5. Unlawful Stops, Searches, or Arrests back to top When one finds more than 5000 TORTS in a case, One is proned to ask is that corruption or violations? WHAT IS CORRUPTION? The simplest definition is: Corruption is the misuse of public power (by elected politician or appointed civil servant) for private gain. In order to ensure that not ony public corruption but also private corruption between individuals and businesses could be covered by the same simple definition: Corruption is the misuse of entrusted power (by heritage, education, marriage, election, appointment or whatever else) for private gain. This broader definition covers not only the politician and the public servant, but also the CEO and CFO of a company, the notary public, the teamleader at a workplace, the administrator or admissions-officer to a private school or hospital, the coach of a soccerteam, etcetera. APPLIES HERE: A much more difficult, scientific definition for the concept ‘corruption’ was developed by profesor (emeritus) dr. Petrus van Duyne: Corruption is an improbability or decay in the decision-making process in which a decision-maker consents to deviate or demands deviation from the criterion which should rule his or her decision-making, in exchange for a reward or for the promise or expectation of a reward, while these motives influencing his or her decision-making cannot be part of the justification of the decision. noun: discrimination; plural noun: discriminations 1. 1. 2. the unjust or prejudicial treatment of different categories of people or things, especially on the grounds of race, age, or sex. 3. synonyms: 1. prejudice, bias, bigotry, intolerance, narrow-mindedness, unfairness, inequity, favoritism, one-sidedness, partisanship; More Institute - Cornell University civil rights: an overview. ... Discrimination occurs when the civil rights of an individual are denied or interfered with because of their membership in a particular ... The provisions of this civil rights act forbade discrimination on the basis of sex as well as race in hiring, promoting, and firing. 1. Background 2. In the 1960s, Americans who knew only the potential of "equal protection of the laws" expected the president, the Congress, and the courts to fulfill the promise of the 14th Amendment. In response, all three branches of the federal government--as well as the public at large--debated a fundamental constitutional question: Does the Constitution's prohibition of denying equal protection always ban the use of racial, ethnic, or gender criteria in an attempt to bring social justice and social benefits? 3. In 1964 Congress passed Public Law 88-352 (78 Stat. 241). The provisions of this civil rights act forbade discrimination on the basis of sex as well as race in hiring, promoting, and firing. The word "sex" was added at the last moment. According to the West Encyclopedia of American Law, Representative Howard W. Smith (D-VA) added the word. His critics argued that Smith, a conservative Southern opponent of federal civil rights, did so to kill the entire bill. Smith, however, argued that he had amended the bill in keeping with his support of Alice Paul and the National Women's Party with whom he had been working. Martha W. Griffiths (D-MI) led the effort to keep the word "sex" in the bill. In the final legislation, Section 703 (a) made it unlawful for an employer to "fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions or privileges or employment, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin." The final bill also allowed sex to be a consideration when sex is a bona fide occupational qualification for the job. Title VII of the act created the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to implement the law. 4. Civil Rights:"Civil rights" are the rights of individuals to be free from unfair or unequal treatment (discrimination) in a number of settings, when that negative treatment is based on the individual's race, gender, religion, national origin, disability, sexual orientation, age, or other protected characteristic. Civil Rights Act of 1964: A federal law that prohibits discrimination in a number of settings: Title I prohibits discrimination in voting; Title II: public accommodations; Title III: Public Facilities; Title IV: Public Education; Title VI: Federally-Assisted Programs; Title VII: Employment.Civil Rights Movement: Historically, the term "Civil Rights Movement" has referred to efforts toward achieving true equality for African-Americans in all facets of society, but today the term "civil rights movement " is also used to describe the advancement of equality for all people regardless of race, sex, age, disability, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, or other protected characteristic. - See more at: http://civilrights.findlaw.com/civil-rights-overview/civil-rights-and-discrimination-glossary.html#sthash.dH02FGeW.dpuf The U>S> has made enough effort to prevent discrimination and I am not faulting the U.S. at all a. I fault the State of Florida for allowing such treatment toi infiltrate its breasts. b. I fault the State Of Florida for neglegting the DUTY OF CARE to citizens and hard-working individuals that had no idea that a racial trap existed in the State./ c. I fault the State of Florida not te U.S. Government anot the Court system either if anybody commits violations, it is not the U.S. Court and I have been trained to recognize where the Fault lays and even after or before ten years. d. I fault the State of Florida for delegating the DUTY OF CARE to a County that is not even properly insured. e. I fault the State of Florida after receiving more than One trillion dollars from the Federal Government and not handling the DUTY OF CARE (DOC) properly. f. I fault the Sttae of Florida andall its consultants for not advising the wonderful Governor sooner of the consequences of not handleing the DUTY OF CARE g. I fault the State of Florida for negating and tearing down the Bullet proff vest of the 1964 CIVIL RIGHTS OF CONGRESS h. I fault the State of Florida for negating all the laws and the Constitutiopn agains discrimination while allowing racial segregation in its breasts with Offer of Proof.a as two Federal Judges stated non-marginally, “The Roys own property in an area that Historically has been racially Segregated.” That is wrong and such wants me want to vomit for in the great State of Florida that is inviting all to do business why such a statement? Why did the Governor delegate the DUTY OF CARE to minor government such as counties and allow such perversion in its breasts? i. I fault the State of Florida for allowing me to loose real money in the form of Appraised properties worth over Fifteen Million dollars with Offer of Proof j. I fault the State of Florida for being NEGLIGENT in handling something so precious. for 5. recognition and understanding of the difference between one thing and another. 6. "discrimination between right and wrong" Racial discrimination occurs when an individual is subjected to unequal treatment because of their actual or perceived race. The U.S. Constitution and the Civil Rights Act of 1964 work in concert to ensure that each resident’s chances in the pursuit of happiness are not damaged by their race. This section offers in-depth information on unlawful racial discrimination in a number of settings, including employment, housing, education, and other public resources. It also provides links to key federal laws and U.S. Supreme Court decisions related to racial discrimination. Use the articles below to learn about prohibited racial discrimination so you can identify and stop improper behavior when you see it. - See more at: http://civilrights.findlaw.com/discrimination/racial-discrimination.html#sthash.EpiJuOw2.dpuf 5. ) injury - definition of injury by The Free Dictionary www.thefreedictionary.com/injury • Cached • Similar Damage or harm done to or suffered by a person or thing: escaped from the accident without injury; a scandal that did considerable injury to the campaign. 2. 6. 1. 7. that which is morally correct, just, or honorable. 8. "she doesn't understand the difference between right and wrong" synonyms: goodness, righteousness, virtue, integrity, rectitude, propriety, morality, truth, honesty, honor, justice, fairness, equity; More lawfulness, legality "the difference between right and wrong" 9. antonyms: wrong 10. 2. 11. a moral or legal entitlement to have or obtain something or to act in a certain way. 12. "she had every right to be angry" synonyms: entitlement, prerogative, privilege, advantage, due, birthright, liberty, authority, power, license, permission, dispensation, leave, sanction, freedom; historicaldroit "you have the right to say no" a. the authority to perform, publish, film, or televise a particular work, event, etc. b. "they sold the paperback rights" 1. 3. 2. the right-hand part, side, or direction. 3. "take the first turning on the right" a. (in football or a similar sport) the right-hand half of the field when facing the opponent's goal. b. Baseball c. short for right field. d. right is the context of laws e. a grouping or political party favoring conservative views and supporting capitalist economic principles. verbThe idea of human rights pre-dates the United Nations. Yet it was only with the setting up of this body that it finally achieved formal, universal recognition. The international community has grown and changed enormously in the course of the twentieth century, but it was one event—the Second World War—that prompted the victors to try to assemble a forum, firstly to deal with some of the War's consequences, but foremost to help provide a way to prevent such appalling events in the future. This forum was the United Nations. 1945 - Human Rights for All The founders of the United Nations responded to the horrors of the Second World War by emphasizing human rights in the Organization’s Charter. At the San Francisco Conference, where the Charter was adopted, some 40 non-governmental organizations successfully lobbied delegates for relatively strong language on human rights what is Human Right? International human rights law is the body of international law designed to promote and protect human rights at the international, regional and domestic levels. As a form of international law, international human rights law is primarily made up of treaties, agreements between states intended to have binding legal effect between the parties that have agreed to them; and customary international law, rules of law derived from the consistent conduct of states acting out of the belief that the law required them to act that way. Other international human rights instruments while not legally binding contribute to the implementation, understanding and development of international human rights law and have been recognised as a source of political obligation.[1] 16. what is HIUMAN RIGHT the definitive work in the field, International Human Rights provides a comprehensive analysis of this wide and diverse subject area. Written by world-renowned scholars Philip Alston and Ryan Goodman, this book is the successor to the widely acclaimed International Human Rights in Context. 17. [5] Therefore, while I gratefully accept the opportunity afforded to me by this court, it is also a right to appear before this Court and all courts in the United States. That right was taken from me by the Walton County and the Northern District Court albeit under pressure and it was the duty of a judicial officer to grant me my rights back and it was not done. Therefore I will not fail to claim that right back and state a claim on all defendants whether those who caused the tort or those who supported and accepted the TORT in this cabal like case. 18. INVOLUNTARY WAIVERS TORT #2 one intentional tort and one involuntary waiver TORTS multiplied by TWENTY DEFENDANTS = 40 torts mutiplied by fifty five injurious torts of Deprivation = 2200 TORTS so far we have a total of 4400 TORTS WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THESE TORTS AS I SEE THEM? AUTHORITATIVE CITATION: 42 U.S. Code § 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law. 2. 1964Civil Rihts Arct of Congress: The Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Pub.L. 88–352, 78 Stat. 241, enacted July 2, 1964) is a landmark piece of civil rights legislation in the United States[5] that outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.[6] It ended unequal application of voter registration requirements and racial segregation Two Federal Judges stated Non-marginally three times between 2007 and 2009: "The ROY’S own property in an area (FLORIDA) that Historically Has been Racially Segregated.” and in the most bizarre twist in history, the two Federal Judges declared that all defendants were right and the Roy's were the loosers despite my Rights under the Fourteenth Amendment in a process where there was never a Jury Trial (Violation of the 1991 Civil Rights act of Congress) to grant Jury Trial and to do justice to the African American Plaintiff Sony Roy, as was requested and promised and scheduled on Final Orders by the Judges who blatantly denied or aborted such trial without DUE PRIOCESS of LAWS. In addition to the violation above, the Fed. Judges committed OVERSIGHT prejudicially against me which was confessed and admitted by the Judges and which I submitted to the United States Supreme Court under Docket #12-8623. This statement will send the chill to the world as it has caused many to speak softly while waiting for Justice to act. This statement will never go away but, will continue to create serious questions about the transparency of the United States even when it is committed by One State only. Furthermore, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeal in apparent support to the State of Florida or to the minor Government, stated emphatically that there was no discrimination found and discrimination would not be tolerated. God intervened and caused the Chairman of the Board of Commissioners to divulged overtly what was hidden by many eyes when he was caught with a racial slur in his e-mail. No one has ever been permitted to break the Law in such a bullying way. If no one looks carefully at what is happening here, the Defendants will be made right in America under that statement and a new PRECEDENT may be formed in court of law to treat minor and major government officials with immunity under the color of law while they are abusing the people through substantive due process, Procedural Due Process, extrinsic Frauds and Frauds upon the Court, and other blatant violations. I lost more than $15 Million Dollars on the Gulf Of Mexico. Meanwhile, the international NAY SAYERS are looking on and wait to find reasons to criticize us if we do not hold the standards. It is time for the State of Florida to deliver Democracy pure and simple. Some Government Employees using the old rudiments of the past attempt to be right at all cost while they are not incompetent, irresponsible and inadequate at all. Therefore the LAW OF INSANITY applies here " If we keep doing what we've been doing we are going to keep getting what we've been getting" How could there be a different result when the keep repeating the offences of the past. People are looking on. Therefore wisdom calls to think that there is another coercive force that is slowing down or attempting to eliminate the process of law in the U.S. Remember to go up we must do righteously and there is no exception. I haste to remind all that the first king who ruled the entire world, Mr. Nebuchadnezzar was conscious of that and drew powers from his subjects not from his cabinet. To the degree that his citizens were treated right was to the degree he was honored and recognized. The Only difference was and is that his was a monarchy and ours is a democracy. But the principle remains the same around the world when the people are treated well and fairly well, justice prevails and we do well, for righteousness exalts a nation. Here is a list of AUTHORITATIVE CITATIONS PERMEATING THIS CASE and CLEAR VIOLATIONS OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT 1. Section 1. Here is the first fact. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. TORT #1 The State of Florida Via the Walton County its agent, did enforce laws that abridged my privileges (With offer of proof) TORT #2 The State of Florida Via the Walton County its agent, did enforce laws that abridged my immunities (With offer of proof) TORT #3 The State of Florida Via the Walton County its agent, did deprive me of my liberty, (with offer of proof) TORT #4 The State of Florida Via the Walton County its agent, did deprive me of all my properties (With offer of proof) TORT #5 The State of Florida Via the Walton County its agent, did attempt to murder me in first degree TORT #6 The State of Florida Via the Walton County its agent, went against the HUD law of steering and deprived me of my rights and my properties in plain day light. Tort #7 The State of Florida Via the Walton County its agent directly by negating the warning given by my attending physician (A COURT WITNESS) about reaching Congestive Heart Failure under prolonged pressure did attempt to deprive me of my life also whoile the world is looking on. Which the Judges and defendants did in common accord 2) the State of Florida through Substantive Due Process enforced laws that abridged my privileges and abused me as a citizen of the United States (With offer of proof) The Fourteenth Amendment (Amendment XIV) to the United States Constitution was adopted on July 9, 1868, as one of the Reconstruction Amendments. The amendment addresses citizenship rights and equal protection of the laws, and was proposed in response to issues related to former slaves following the American Civil War. The amendment was bitterly contested, particularly by Southern states, which were forced to ratify it in order for them to regain representation in Congress. The Fourteenth Amendment, particularly its first section, is one of the most litigated parts of the Constitution, forming the basis for landmark decisions such as Roe v. Wade (1973), regarding abortion, and Bush v. Gore (2000), regarding the 2000 presidential election. The amendment limits the actions of all state and local officials, including those acting on behalf of such an official. 3) WHAT IS A CIVIL RIGHT? A civil right is an enforceable right or privilege, which if interfered with by another gives rise to an action for injury. Such injuries happened to me and I have been suffering for more about Ten Years. 4."Civil rights" are the rights of individuals to receive equal treatment (and to be free from unfair treatment or "discrimination") in a number of settings -- including education, employment, housing, and more -- and based on certain legally-protected characteristics. Historically, the "Civil Rights Movement" referred to efforts toward achieving true equality for African-Americans in all facets of society, but today the term "civil rights" is also used to describe the advancement of equality for all people regardless of race, sex, age, disability, national origin, religion, or certain other characteristics. - See more at: http://civilrights.findlaw.com/civil-rights-overview/what-are-civil-rights.html#sthash.aP4PBZpI.dpuf 4) THE 1964 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT 5) THE 1965 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT 6) THE 1968 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT 7) THE 1975 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT 8) THE 1991 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT